The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) was enacted in 1977 to protect consumers from abusive, unfair, and deceptive practices by third-party debt collectors. The law details when and how a collector may contact a debtor. The government enforcer of the law has historically been the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), but some regulatory duties may be shared with the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection housed within the Federal Reserve, created in 2010. The FDCPA is a strict civil liability law, which means that a consumer need not prove actual damages in order to claim statutory damages of up to $1,000 per violation plus reasonable attorney fees.

See all Topics
AdobeStock-opinion

We Need to Re-Examine the Meaning of Third Party Disclosure

5 April 2018

istock-light-bulb-idea-different-unique

A Re-imagined Debt Collection Call Opening

2 April 2018

AdobeStock-court-decisions-judge-decide

FDCPA Caselaw Review for February 2018

2 April 2018

AdobeStock-win banner

BREAKING: 2nd Circuit Upholds Taylor, Big Industry Win on Interest Disclosure Issue

29 March 2018

AdobeStock-verify-confirm-verification-check

7th Circuit Holds Verification Requirement is of Debt Collector’s Records, not Creditor’s

27 March 2018

AdobeStock-opinion-survey-feedback-people-consumer

CFPB Wants to Know Your Priorities Related to the FDCPA

22 March 2018

AdobeStock-bill-invoice-itemize-due-payment-charges

N.D. Illinois: Debt Itemization Does Not Imply Interest May Accrue

14 March 2018

AdobeStock-dismissed-case-court

FDCPA Caselaw Review for January 2018

8 March 2018

pixabay-massachusetts

Collection Industry Requests Guidance from Mass AG Regarding Longstanding Interpretation of Validation Requirements

1 March 2018

AdobeStock-common-sense

Church Provides No Sanctuary: Sixth Circuit’s FDCPA Decision May Breathe New Life into TCPA Spokeo Arguments

22 February 2018

AdobeStock-common-sense

Maryland Court Finds Mini-Miranda Not Necessary on Certain Consumer-Initiated Calls

21 February 2018

AdobeStock-search-meaning-vision-clarity-clear-seek-above

Debt Collectors Hoping For Relief from Courts on Collection Letter Claims May Soon Get Clarity (podcast)

20 February 2018

AdobeStock-court-justice-decision-jury-plaintiff-judge-defendant

N.D. Illinois Makes Reasonable Ruling on Interest Disclosure Requirements

15 February 2018

pixabay_fdcpa_error_technical-detail_lawsuit_frivilous

New Jersey: Including a Phone Number on Initial Letter Does Not Violate the FDCPA

6 February 2018

AdobeStock-accuse-point-finger-fault

7th Cir. Holds Debt Collector Violated FDCPA Despite Using Miller Safe Harbor Language

29 January 2018

AdobeStock-disclosure

E.D.N.Y. Decides “Settlement May Have Tax Consequences” is an Acceptable 1099C Disclosure

22 January 2018

pixabay-congress-washington-house-senate

Committee Meets Today on Bill to Exempt Lawyers from FDCPA

17 January 2018

AdobeStock-court-decisions-judge-decide

FDCPA Caselaw Review for December 2017

17 January 2018

AdobeStock-justice-court-judge

Perfect Storm Coalesces as Division of Banks, Debt Buyers and Consumer Lawyers Await Decision in Massachusetts

16 January 2018

AdobeStock-court-justice-decision-jury-plaintiff-judge-defendant

Debt Collection Activity Alone Does Not a Debt Collector Make, According to Northern District of Illinois

10 January 2018